Jun 15

 I’ve always been a bit of a science nerd so when, many years ago, a girlfriend insisted that cold water would boil faster than hot water, I refused to simply take her at her word. First I applied some critical thinking - a step I highly recommend whenever somebody tells you something that sounds a little off.

Boiling water is simply approaching a transition state between one form and another. It is in a liquid state and approaching a gas state. In order for any material to change states you either have to increase or decrease energy. Basically, you’re trying to excite or calm the molecules in the material.

In the case of water, its normal “room temperature” state is as a liquid. Remove heat (energy) sufficiently and it will become a solid (ice). Increase heat (energy) sufficiently and it will become a gas (water vapor or steam).

Now, and here’s where my science breaks down a bit, if I want to boil water, I have to excite those molecules. I have to get them moving. A passing familiarity with the laws of motion had me thinking that it’s easier to move a boulder already in motion than it is to move a boulder that’s standing completely still. It takes less energy to move or maintain motion in something that is already in motion. Seems that would apply at the molecular level too, wouldn’t it?

If you accept that you need energy to “move” water molecules sufficiently to boil water and you also accept that the molecules in cold water are moving slower than the molecules in hot water, common sense would dictate this myth is false. The same amount of energy applied to the same amount of cold water vs. hot water should result in reaching the boiling point more slowly. It also stands to reason that a pot of water just short of boiling is going to get there a lot sooner than a pot of water pulled from the freezer just before it freezes.

So there’s the common sense approach of applying logic. The actual experiment was pretty simple. Let the faucet run on cold, fill a pot with two cups of cold water and time how long it takes to boil. Then repeat but use water from a hot tap. In an effort to inspire your own scientific interest, I’ll leave it to you to try out but I’ll give you one big hint on the results. The myth was wrong.

Topics: Fun Stuff, Science |

3 Responses to “Does Cold Water Boil Faster?”

    Wulf Richardson Says:
    March 30th, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    I got into an argument about this when I was stationed onboard the USS McInerney.
    I couldn’t believe my ears, nor could I believe how many people sided with the wanker who insisted it was true.
    When I got out of the service and went to University, a friend and I actually performed the experiment.
    We literally danced with joy when the cold water took longer to boil, singing, “It’s a lie, it’s a lie!”

    Dave Says:
    March 31st, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    Wulf, that’s brilliant! It never fails to amaze me how people will believe anything they’re told if one tells them with enough conviction or enough people agree with the story. Good for you for thinking for yourself and putting the claims to the test. Thou art NOT a lemming!

    Jim Says:
    January 10th, 2010 at 11:36 am

    Probably the inverse of this silliness is the myth that hot water will freeze faster into ice cubes. I have seen people do this time and again and if you try to straighten them out not only will they stand their ground but they treat you as an idiot!

Comments